IELTS Speaking Part 3: Two-Way Discussion
Part 3 is where the highest band scores are unlocked — and where the most marks are lost by candidates who treat it like Part 1. Understanding what this section demands is the first step to scoring well.
What Is Part 3?
Part 3 lasts 4–5 minutes. The examiner will ask a series of abstract, open-ended questions linked to the theme of your Part 2 cue card. These questions move beyond your personal experience and into broader societal, cultural, and philosophical territory.
Unlike Part 1, where the examiner follows a fixed set of questions, Part 3 is genuinely conversational. The examiner may follow up on your answers, probe your reasoning, or introduce a counterpoint. This is not an attempt to catch you out — it is an opportunity to demonstrate your ability to discuss complex ideas in English.
Why Part 3 Is Different — and Why It Matters
Part 3 is not about your personal life. The examiner is asking about trends, comparisons, causes, and societal implications. A question like “How has technology changed the way people socialise?” requires you to speak about society in general — not just your own habits.
This is where Bands 7, 8, and 9 are primarily determined. A candidate who only ever speaks about their personal experience in Part 3 will not access the higher band descriptors for Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range. Abstract discussion requires more sophisticated vocabulary and grammatical structures — and examiners are specifically listening for them here.
The AREA Technique for Part 3 Answers
Use the AREA framework to structure every Part 3 answer. It ensures you answer directly, justify your view, support it with evidence, and demonstrate intellectual balance — all within a natural conversational length of 45–90 seconds.
Answer the question directly
State your position in your first sentence. Do not build up to your answer — give it immediately. This signals confidence and clarity to the examiner.
Reason — explain why
Expand on your answer with a clear explanation. This is where you demonstrate your ability to analyse and not just assert. Use phrases like 'This is largely because...' or 'The main reason for this is...'
Example to support your point
A specific example — a country, a trend, a study, or a personal observation — makes your argument credible. You do not need to cite real statistics. Saying 'In many parts of Europe, for instance...' is enough.
Alternative view or concession
Acknowledge that the issue is not black and white. Phrases like 'That said...' or 'I can see why some would argue...' show intellectual maturity and push your score into the upper bands.
Sample Part 3 Questions & Model Answers
These questions follow on from the “influential person” cue card used in the Part 2 guide. Notice how each answer speaks about society broadly, not just personal experience.
Part 3 Question
“Do you think teachers have more influence on children than parents?”
“That is an interesting question to consider. I would argue that parents generally have a more profound influence, particularly in the early years when a child's values and personality are still being formed. The home environment shapes a child's sense of identity, emotional security, and fundamental attitudes towards the world.”
“That said, teachers play a distinctive and arguably irreplaceable role from a different angle. They are the people who introduce children to ideas, ways of thinking, and areas of knowledge that parents may not have access to. A particularly inspiring teacher can ignite a lifelong passion — for literature, science, or the arts — in a way that transforms a child's trajectory. So I would say the two influences are complementary rather than competing, though the parental influence tends to run deeper simply because of the time and emotional bond involved.”
Part 3 Question
“How has the influence of celebrities on young people changed in recent years?”
“It has changed enormously, and largely because of social media. In the past, celebrities were relatively distant figures — you might see them in a film or on television, but the interaction was always one-way. Nowadays, influencers and celebrities communicate directly with their followers, sharing everyday moments, opinions, and even personal struggles. This creates a sense of intimacy that previous generations simply did not have access to.”
“The impact of this shift is difficult to overstate. On one hand, it has given young people access to role models from more diverse backgrounds and with more relatable life experiences. On the other hand, it has also intensified pressure around appearance, lifestyle, and consumption in a way that raises real concerns. I think it depends on whether the celebrity uses their platform responsibly — which, unfortunately, is not always the case.”
Part 3 Question
“Should schools teach students about famous historical figures?”
“I think there is genuine value in it, yes — provided it is done thoughtfully. Learning about historical figures gives students a sense of continuity and context. Understanding the decisions made by leaders in the past helps young people develop a more nuanced view of how societies evolve and how individuals can shape events, for better or worse.”
“However, I would argue that the manner of teaching matters as much as the content. If historical figures are presented uncritically, as simply heroic or villainous, the lesson becomes superficial. A more valuable approach encourages students to evaluate these individuals in their historical context — acknowledging both their contributions and their failures. This kind of critical thinking is arguably more important than the factual content itself.”
Useful Language for Part 3
These phrases are natural, varied, and appropriate for abstract discussion. Practise using them until they feel spontaneous — not memorised.
Giving an opinion
- ➤“From my perspective...”
- ➤“In my view, it is largely a question of...”
- ➤“I would argue that...”
- ➤“It seems to me that...”
Agreeing / conceding a point
- ➤“That is certainly true in some cases...”
- ➤“I can see why people might think that, however...”
- ➤“There is something to be said for that view, but...”
Speculating
- ➤“It is difficult to say for certain, but...”
- ➤“One could argue that...”
- ➤“It could be argued that...”
- ➤“I would imagine that...”
Comparing & contrasting
- ➤“In contrast to...”
- ➤“Compared with previous generations...”
- ➤“Whereas in the past...”
- ➤“On the other hand...”
Giving reasons
- ➤“This is largely due to...”
- ➤“The main reason for this is...”
- ➤“A contributing factor would be...”
Expressing uncertainty
- ➤“It depends on whether...”
- ➤“That very much depends on the context...”
- ➤“I am not entirely sure, but I think...”
Common Mistakes in Part 3
- 1Giving short yes/no answers.“Yes, I think so” is not a Part 3 answer — it is a wasted opportunity. Every question in Part 3 is an invitation to demonstrate complex language. Always develop your point.
- 2Not justifying opinions.Stating a view without explaining why is one of the clearest markers of a Band 5–6 candidate. The examiner wants to hear your reasoning — use “because”, “which means”, and “the reason for this is” to force yourself to justify every claim.
- 3Speaking only about personal experience.When asked “Do you think young people today are less independent?”, answering with “In my family, my brother...” does not address the question. Speak about society, trends, and generational shifts — save the personal anecdote for a brief supporting detail, not the entire answer.
Want to practise Part 3 discussions?
Book a session with Sahil for live abstract discussion practice and band-specific feedback.
Book a Part 3 Session →